new physical model of the real constitution of matter and light – which shows division processes. The origin discussion between Bohr and Einstein comes to an end without any real solution of these problems. Bohr was providing an interpretational compromise between classical mechanics and quantum physics, called quantum mechanics or Copenhagen interpretation, which allows physicists to use the particle imagination furthermore – not at least to rescue the classical atom- and elementary particle hypothesis. It allows them furthermore to ignore the deep theoretical (modeling) contradictions in and between several physical concepts - and the role of the perception of reality by thinking, the way how the conscious mind is working.

By this reason the particle (or body) picture is accepted until today as a kind of spectacle through we try to see and understand nature, human beeing, their dynamics (in physics, biology and society) and our relationship to nature. This paradigm is ruling all our interpretations, also in physics, chemistry and biology. But it doesn´t allow anymore to understand nature in principle. So it seems that insight in the true nature of nature (and our nature) is impossible for ever. That fact is known as quantum enigma or the contradiction between the wave and the particle (body) model, called wave- quantum paradox. Nevertheless the most people including scientists are believing that this worldview is completely safed by experiments. But this is not true.

The quantum mechanical interpretation is excluding any explanation of experiments with single particles. Even because the experiment – par example the double-slit experiment or the partial reflection process – shows, that it is not possible anymore to explain the experimental facts with single atoms, particles or energy quantums, when they were imaginated as very small pointlike energy concentrations, simplified called „particles“. The quantum mechanical interpretation is build on the assumtion that is not possible in principle to explain these experiments with single quantums or atoms. Nevertheless the experiment – and the mathematical model – shows the complete counterwise fact: They (matter and radiation) are able to pass the double-slit simultanously. This is the so-called interference condition. That shows that there are real division processes. But the quantum mechanical interpretation assumes that this fact, which is correct mirrored by the mathematical tools, has no consequences for our concept of the constitution of reality and our worldview. In this way quantum mechanics is closing her eyes when facing the experiment, and scating over a monstreous obstacle without any reflection.

Here I like to show what the core of the physical and nature- philosophical problem is: The basic paradigm of our worlview, the atom- and elementary particle hypothesis, which could not be satisfied by experiments. The quantum enigma could be solved by a contradictionary free explanation based on a nonprejudiced view on the mentioned exeriments. It forces us to replace the atom- and particle hypothesis by a new physical principle, extracted directly from the experiment: The principle of a holistic division process. We can imagine this process as a cell division process, well known from nature, but impossible in principle in the mechanistic worldview, and now applicable on field properties. So I try to achieve a click in the mind to recognize the simplicity of the problem, a broad popular understanding of the deep conflicts of modern science, the endless possibilities for further discoveries, and the possibility of a solution which allows without any pressure to understand nature, structure building, processes and dynamics in a new way – and the mysterious mind too.This is science in the original sense of the word. Nevertheless I´m not a scientist. I´m an architect and designer – so I call this kind of reflection and holistic thinking descience.

The Solution and the Plan to Implement
To solve the quantum enigma and revolute our basic paradigm seems to be very difficult, nearly impossible as Richard Feynman says. Because we need a lot of phantasy limited by a straightjacket. This straightjacket was the atom- and elementary particle hypothesis. Now we have an idea what´s going on in nature. We have to explain the double-slit experiment or the partial reflection as a holistic division process on one side, as a branching electromagnetic field, but on the other side as a pointlike collaps of this fresh generated field structure and, in matter, as new branching event. This chainlike explanation would be in full accordance with the experiment and would change our worlview for ever. But the main communication problem remains: Surprisingly would not the agreement with the experimental facts but the missing accordance with all other physical theories prevent a fast change. So the real straightjacket is to explain the constituition of nature and dynamic processes with this new principle and to show, at which points in the ancient theories we can localize swiches to determine the new course of science convincing.

The bifurcation or branching process is undoubtly verifiable by experiments, but what we see in the experiments is determined by our theories, as Einstein said. So I try to show in the shortest way, that in fact the paradigm is ruling the interpretation of our theories. If we change the old paradigm we recognize in this theories clear the branching process. Some examples:

1801 Young invented the double-slit experiment and discovered the interference condition (contradicts the particle hypothesis). Shows a branching process, interpreted as something that can go trough both slits simultanously – called „ether waves“.

1811 Avogadro´s Original Hypothesis: Forced by chemical experiments (mass and volume properties) he comes to the conclusion that elementary structures must underlie a division process during the chemical reaction (contradicts the particle hypothesis).

1844 Faraday discovered the electromagnetic induction process and invented a new term for real existing structrures called electric or magnetic fields. Plea for an explanation of matter as concentrated fields.

1864 Maxwell gives the mathematical description of his ideas, called „Dynamic of the Electromagnetic Field“. Field was interpreted as wave that moves with c (the speed of light) trough the space (or ether). Alltough he was forced to use complex numbers to get a fitting description he ignored the imaginary solutions, because he was not able to give a physical explanation or convincing picture for his „postponement term“ (a branching event like polarization which is creating a structure of the field – if he would seen that, dynamics have to interprete as holistic structural changing).

1905 Einstein creates the light quantum theory to describe pointlike intercations with discrete energy amounts between light (the electromagnetic field) and matter. Behind he assumed a unknown structure of the electromagnetic field. Provosorial he was using the pointlike quantum- picture nevertheless there is a contradiction to Young´s interference condition. He was knowing that very well and insists ever for a convincing solution of the „greatest theoretical problem of physics“.

1924 Bose- Einstein-Condensation: Einstein creates a new mathematical tool to model and predict strange light and matter properties. Says in statistical terms that the idea of separated entities like particles in mechanics is wrong. Shows, that light and matter are able to realize a „melting“ or structure collaps process depending from a special mirrorsymmetrical structure of photons and atoms. physical only understandable as collapse of branched structures. Shows the reverse process of cell division, the reverse branching process. Would also come out by the use and right interpretation of the imaginary solutions in the Maxwell equations. But still missing, also in Einsteins Special Theory of Relativity.

1925 Quantum physics shows new, in the mechanical worldview nonunderstandable properties of matter: Field characteristics (wave properties of electrons and atoms), combined with energetic hierarchies, antisymmetric field properties (spin) and complete mirrored forms (antimatter). Behind: Branching Processes wich generates field structures like the cell division process (doubling and mirroring). Find it´s mathematical expression in the use of the system of complex numbers and especially the complex conjugated variable. Official meaning: unclear.

I try to explain this simple idea, the whole program and their complex impact for our worldview in form of a rich illustrated book, a website with free downloadable film material (computer animations to visualize experiments as processes) and other relevant historical material. Money is need only for the finish of the book (illustrations), the creation of computer animations and the web-platform. I will invite other people to make contributions and examine the consequences, especially young physicists, chemicists, biologists, artists and philosophers, The goal is to initiate a worldwide movement to renew our worlview (permanently) and come to an satisfying science understanding for everyone.